Coach

You know you lost. See what to do about it at the next training session.

Game statistics usually stop at who took how many shots. Here that is where it starts, and it leads to a specific drill.

See this on your own gamesSign in

Sound familiar

  • The sheet from the statistician arrives on Tuesday, and training was on Monday.
  • You can see something goes wrong in the third quarter, but you cannot show the team a number for it.
  • After a loss everyone has a theory and none of them can be checked.
  • You do not know whether the change you made a month ago did anything at all.
12
rules asking your data
142
drills from the coaching literature
5
measures in a player's trend

The game recorded at the table, the conclusions the same evening

You record possession by possession — action code, zone, time, the five on court. Right after the game you have the full set of tables and a summary: the rhythm of the game, where the points came from, tempo, runs, turnovers, a map of shot zones and the on-court balance of each five.

The comparison that ends the argument

You pick two sets of games — wins against losses, home against away, the last five against the rest of the season — and you get the difference written out as a number. You choose the set with filters, and the report names the games it computed from.

A player's trend across the season

Five measures for one player, game by game: points, three-point percentage, share of possessions, on-court balance and the third quarter separately. You mark the game where you changed something, and the chart shows “before” and “after”.

The training loop: you write down what to improve — the system checks whether it improved

You record a focus on a specific metric for a player. After a few games you get a verdict: improvement, no change, or not enough data. You do not have to remember it or work it out by hand.

Specific drills, not generalities

Twelve rules ask your data questions such as “are the free throws weak enough that they need work”. When one of them fires, you get a circuit of drills from the coaching literature — with performance criteria and the source they came from.

A system that says “check this” instead of guessing

Every verdict comes with a confidence interval. If the number itself is on the wrong side of the threshold but at that number of attempts it could be chance, the system asks for an assessment instead of recommending drills. The “Why this one?” screen shows every rule — including the silent ones, and says why.

From the table to the training session — four steps, one chain of data

Nothing has to be retyped between tools. What you write down at the table travels all the way to the training recommendation.

Four steps: you record the game at the table, the stats compute themselves, the report says what happened, and the system points at what to practise.
  1. You record the gamePossession by possession: action code, shot zone, time, the five on court, the player finishing it — from a phone or a laptop at the table.
  2. The stats compute themselvesThirteen 5×5 and 3×3 modules — the same tables your statistician has been building by hand.
  3. The report says what happenedThe rhythm of the quarters, runs, shot zones, the balance of each five, a player's trend — with a warning when the sample is too small for a conclusion.
  4. The system says what to practiseTwelve rules ask your data about specific weaknesses and point at drills from the coaching literature.

We are not replacing the coach. We shorten the path from what happened on the floor to what you set up at training — and we show the numbers it stands on.

See this on your own gamesBack to the overview